Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Meehan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9754PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Hamilton Circuit Court, sustaining the proceedings of the hoard of county commissioners in establishing a public ditch.

The only questions in the record are those presented by the ruling refusing a new trial.

The trial court permitted appellee to read in evidence a •transcript of a part of the proceedings of the commissioners, and this ruling is complained of. Counsel do not point out ■any specific objections to the ruling, but say, “The record was mot, in our opinion, competent evidence. The petition was prepared by the appellee, and, so far as this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Colee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Sydleman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  3. Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Porter v. Pequonnoc Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  5. City of Indianapolis v. HufferIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API