Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINS

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 27, 2010No. ARMY 20080132Published

1DissentHam, Judge

I dissent. A DuBay6 hearing is inappropriate under the facts of this case and is almost certainly a waste of time. Despite the exhaustive search for Defense Exhibit A at the trial level, and the government’s continued opportunity during the pendency of this appeal to either find Defense Exhibit A or submit an adequate reconstruction of it, the exhibit is still missing and no adequate reconstruction has been forthcoming. Defense Exhibit A’s absence from the record is unequivocally a substantial omission, and the government’s efforts over the last two and one-half year’s have not overcome the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API