Legal Opinion

United States v. Specialist JONATHAN R. ZAK

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 5, 2007No. ARMY 20050051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KIRBY, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of rape and adultery, in violation of Articles 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The panel sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for six years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. Pursuant to the staff judge advocate’s (SJA) recommendation (SJAR), the convening authority approved only sixty-nine months of the sentence to confinement, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. BankerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. Ferlin PlateroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LeonhardtUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API