Legal Opinion

In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 15, 1975No. 150PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

The States of Connecticut, Kansas and Florida have separately instituted in their respective federal districts three antitrust class actions against a total of twenty-three major oil companies. Each state is suing individually and on behalf of its agencies, departments and political subdivisions that are consumers of petroleum products and services; the Connecticut class also includes all individual purchasers within the state. The complaints in each action contain allegations that defendants jointly and severally violated various federal antitrust laws and, in essence,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sado v. IsraelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  2. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  3. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  4. In re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API