Legal Opinion

In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided September 7, 1979No. 150Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

The Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, previously has centralized several actions in this litigation in the Central District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned them to the Honorable William P. Gray. In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 419 F.Supp. 712 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1976).1 The actions presently before Judge Gray in the Central District of California include actions brought by the States of Connecticut, Florida, California, Washington, Oregon, Arizona and Kansas, and by the City of Long Beach, California. The complaints in the state…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic Cleocin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  2. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  3. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  4. In Re Women's Clothing Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  5. In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API