Legal Opinion
In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided January 21, 1976No. 150PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
I. Overview
The Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, previously transferred an action pending in the District of Kansas to the District of Connecticut and, with the consent of that court, assigned it to the Honorable T. Emmet Clarie for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with • an action pending there.1 Since the above-captioned action appeared to raise questions of fact common to the actions in the transferee district, the Panel ordered the parties to show cause why it should not likewise be transferred to the District of Connecticut for centralized pretrial…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Republic National-Realty Equities Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving Antibiotic DrugsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at Florida Everglades on December 29, 1972United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- In Re Nissan Motor Corp. Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Midwest Milk Monopolization LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In re Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979