Legal Opinion

Potter v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1956No. 36,989PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Judge.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission on the ground that employer-relator had neither knowledge nor notice of employee’s injury within 90 days after the accident as required by M. S. A. 176.141.

On September 15, 1953, employee while unloading empty steel drums, piled three high on a truck, was struck on his chest by a falling drum which tore through his shirt and cut his right nipple. He examined the injury and sat down for a few minutes because the blow knocked the wind out of him; then he got up and went back to work. The wound bled a little but he did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Nelson v. Reid & WackmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Bruggeman v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Big Horn Coal Company v. WartenslebenWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API