Legal Opinion
Feutz v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 27, 1949No. 5873PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULEN, District Judge.
Memorandum on (A) motion to have the verdict and the judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with motions for a directed verdict offered at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence and at the close of all the evidence 'and, in the alternative, for a new trial, and (B) motion for a new trial on third-party complaint.
From a jury verdict of $40,000.00 for plaintiffs, defendant Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company1 2seeks relief, first, by joint and alternative motion under Rule 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. FeutzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AMERICAN BONDINGDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985