J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
This case is now before me to rewrite for tire majority an opinion that was originally written as a dissent.
Imported plastic toilet roll holders, with back plates, were entered on September 13,1961, as unenumerated articles dutiable, by virtue of the similitude provision of paragraph 1559, in the case of the plastic roll holders at 30 per centum ad valorem under modified paragraph 212, and in the case of the back plates at 19 per centum ad valorem under modified paragraph 397. The merchandise was liquidated as it was entered.
Plaintiff’s protest claim as to the back plates has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- A. W. Ronald Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glenside Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Dynamic Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.