Legal Opinion

A. W. Ronald Associates v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 13, 1961No. C.D. 2267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case is described on the invoice as “ ‘Klick’ Soap Holders” and was classified by similitude under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, under the provision for sanitary ware of plain white porcelain. Duty was assessed at 33 per centum ad valorem. Various claims are made in the protest but the one relied upon is that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of said tariff act, as modified, as an unenumerated manufactured article.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Alex W. Block Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API