Legal Opinion

Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1961No. C.D. 2251PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of artificial teeth made of plastic, assessed with duty at YO per centum ad valorem under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T.D. 51909. Said paragraph covers china, porcelain, and other vitrified wares, and this merchandise was classified thereunder, by virtue of the similitude clause of paragraph 1559, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1954. It is claimed to be properly dutiable as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bernstein & Skolnick, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Alex W. Block Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API