Legal Opinion

Woodrow Ex Rel. Callahan v. Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that this case is not within the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, and that plaintiff can maintain this action in tbe Superior Court, all tbe evidence, considered in tbe light most favorable to tbe plaintiff, fails to sbow any actionable negligence on tbe part of tbe defendants, or either of them. Tbe judgment as of nonsuit was properly entered. Smith v. Sink, 211 N. C., 725, and cases there cited.

It rather appears that tbe unfortunate injury to plaintiff was one of those accidents which sometimes happen unexpectedly — “an event resulting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Crutchfield v. . R. D. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benton v. United Bank Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API