White & Co. v. Magarahan
Supreme Court of Georgia
Debtor and creditor. Husband and wife. Notice. Deeds. New trial. Before Judge Roney. Richmond superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
The firm of Durst, Shea & Co., of which Magarahan was a member, obtained credit from White & Co. upon the faith of a statement made for the purpose of obtaining the credit to the Bradstreet Mercantile Agency, dated October 4th, 1887, and signed by the firm and Magarahan individually, in which it was represented that the latter owned real estate to the value of $16,-000.00. White & Co. sold various bills of goods to Durst, Shea & Co., the last credit being given in Jahu*218ary, 1888. November 19th, 1887, Magarahan, by a voluntary deed, conveyed to his wife for life the land…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Leeds Building Products, Inc. v. Sears Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. VoylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Baxley v. BaxleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Guyer v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.