Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gerchak

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2011No. 2011-0700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David John Gerchak, Attorney Registration No. 0069060, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998. In August 2010, Disciplinary Counsel, relator, filed a complaint charging Gerchak with misconduct and violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct based on misrepresentations he made to the bankruptcy court.

{¶ 2} The parties filed stipulations of fact and stipulated that Gerchak had violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline conducted a hearing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. PotterOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Discipilnary Counsel v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Mahoning County Bar Association v. GerchakOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Brown-DanielsOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API