Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The plaintiffs in error filed their petitions in the circuit court of Shelby county for the writs of certiorari, to review the action of the board of equalization of the city of Memphis in its valuation of two parcels of real estate, as the basis of ad valorem taxation by the city.

The petitions charge that the valuations so made were “grossly beyond the real and actual value” of the property described, and so excessive as to become confiscatory. No facts are alleged from which the conclusion of confiscation is drawn, except that in the case of one of the pieces of property, an office…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Burnett v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Conners v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tennessee Central Railroad v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Tomlinson v. Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cooper v. Williamson County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Emory v. Memphis City Schools Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Gatlinburg Beer Regulation Committee v. OgleTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API