Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Creative Financial Planning Organization, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2257PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
This ease involves a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit brought jointly by pro se plaintiffs Lucinda Hammond and James L. Martin against various defendants. Defendants have moved for a dismissal of the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs have responded to defendants’ motions and have filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed more fully below, plaintiffs will be granted leave to amend their complaint. The motion for summary judgment will be marked withdrawn as moot.
(I) Facts
Lucinda Hammond brought suit in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Spencer v. SteinmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Marchese v. UmsteadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Panayotides v. RabenoldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Reynolds v. WagnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.