Legal Opinion

Marchese v. Umstead

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2000No. 00-1253PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff B.J. Márchese (“Márchese”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”), alleging that his civil rights were violated by defendants Robert Umstead (“Umstead”), the Borough of Royersford (“Borough”), and Jennifer Walters Brown (“Brown”). Márch-ese also asserts various state law claims. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1367. It is undisputed that the law of Pennsylvania applies to the state law claims.

Presently before the Court are the motions of defendants Umstead and the Borough…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Stolinski v. PennypackerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  2. Eichelman v. Lancaster CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Dennison v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Steshenko v. GayrardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Montanye v. Wissahickon School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API