Legal Opinion
Quartuccio v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided June 17, 2002No. 01-997PublishedCited by 265 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARLEY, Judge:
Before the Court is a May 14, 2001, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that declined to reopen the appellant’s claim for service connection for schizophrenia because it concluded that the appellant had not submitted new and material evidence. The appellant filed a motion for remand and stay of proceedings, in lieu of a brief. The Secretary filed a response in opposition to the appellant’s motion, and a brief, and the appellant filed a reply brief. The Court has jurisdiction of the case under 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the following reasons, the Court will vacate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murincsak v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Holliday v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Baker v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Graves v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Voerth v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
3Cited by265 opinions
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Henry L. Conway, Jr., Claimant-Appellee v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- L IZZIE K. M AY FIELD v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Pauline Prickett v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.