Legal Opinion

Town of Nichols Hills v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1958No. 38172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding brought in this court wherein The Town of Nichols Hills seeks a writ of mandamus against the Attorney General requiring him, as Ex-Officio Bond Commissioner of the State of Oklahoma, to approve a bond issue voted by the people of said town under the provisions of Sec. 27, Art. 10, Oklahoma Constitution, for the purpose of enlarging and improving its fire department.

The sole ground presented by the Attorney General for disapproving the bond issue is that the language of the proposition submitted to the voters of The Town of Nichols Hills in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Town of Afton v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Borin v. City of ErickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rabinowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Steilberg v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. City of Sallisaw v. NesbittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API