Legal Opinion

City of Sallisaw v. Nesbitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1963No. 40474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus against the Attorney General requiring him, as Ex-Officio Bond Commissioner of the State of Oklahoma, to approve two bond issues voted by the people of Sallisaw under the provisions of Sec. 27, Art. 10, Oklahoma Constitution, for the purposes, respectively, of incurring indebtedness by issuing bonds in the sum of $158,000.00 for extending and improving the waterworks system, and incurring indebtedness by issuing bonds in the sum of $101,000.00 for extending and improving the electric system and the electric distribution system, both public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Nichols Hills v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Tettleton v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Quinn v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Dean v. Wes Watkins Area Vocational-Technical School District, No. 25Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Sooner State Water, Inc. v. Town of AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API