Legal Opinion
Arthur D. Little International, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 16, 1996No. Civil Action 94-11875-PBSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
From 1988 to 1991, defendants Dooyang Corporation, Dooyang International, and Dooyang America (collectively “Dooyang”) hired plaintiff Arthur D. Little International, Inc. (“ADL”) to provide business consulting services in relation to an investment in an aluminum smelter. ADL brought this action in Massachusetts state court on August 11, 1994 to collect on three unpaid bills totalling approximately $460,000, and to recover for damages incurred by reliance on Dooyang’s promises to pay the bills. Dooyang removed to federal court based on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Arthur D. Little International, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Szulik v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Pearson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.