Legal Opinion

Burton v. Celentano

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 2, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This is a nuisance case involving the Floodplain Management Act, A.R.S. § 45-2341 et seq. The plaintiffs brought an action in the superior court of Pima County and simultaneously filed a petition for order to show cause requesting that a preliminary mandatory injunction issue ordering the defendants to remove a wooden wall erected on the defendants’ property allegedly diverting the natural flow of Finger Rock Wash. On October 20,1981, an order issued granting the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary mandatory injunction and the defendants were ordered to remove the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 990, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,594 Ina P. Anderson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Houston Compressed Steel Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Brennan Petroleum P. Co., Inc. v. Pasco Petroleum Co., Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1974
  4. Pima County v. CardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. County of Cochise v. Board of Supervisors of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Shoen v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. City of Stamford v. KovacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. TP Racing, L.L.L.P. v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. County of Du Page v. GavrilosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API