Legal Opinion

Todd v. Joyner

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 2008No. 4315PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Frances Irene Todd appeals several evidentiary rulings of the trial court as well as the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial nisi additur. We affirm. 1

FACTS

On September 4, 2002, Todd and Barbara C. Joyner were involved in an automobile accident in Georgetown, South Carolina. As a result of injuries sustained in the accident, Todd brought this action. Joyner stipulated to her negligence in the case. 2

On February 27, 2006, Joyner made Dr. Richard J. Friedman available for deposition as an expert in the field of orthopedic surgery. Friedman was not available to testify live at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Pike v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Mills v. GrotheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Bonser v. ShainholtzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Ray v. DraegerAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lynch v. Carolina Self Storage Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Riley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API