Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Fickenscher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1905No. 12,297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Dawson county: Homer M. Sullivan, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

This action was brought by Henry Fickenscher against the Union Pacific Railroad Company to recover damages sustained by him in a prairie fire which he alleges was set out through the negligence of the defendant. Upon the trial a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant prosecutes error.

A detailed statement of the facts with reference to the fire, together with a map of the locality, is to be found in *498Union P. R. Co. v. Fickenscher, 72 Neb. 187. The plaintiff in this case is the brother of John Fickenscher, and, with his father, Ulrich Fickenscher, was in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sycamore Marsh Harvester Co. v. GrundradNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Spurck v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. FickenscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McCune v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Young v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Katskee v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Blum v. Nebraska-Iowa Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cole v. GerstenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. FickenscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API