Sycamore Marsh Harvester Co. v. Grundrad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Colfax county. Tried below before Post, J.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
This action was brought to recover the purchase price of a Marsh harvester which the plaintiff alleges it sold to the defendant in error on the 16th day of July, .1880, for the agreed price of $260, and for which the defendant in error agreed to'execute and deliver to the plaintiff his promissory notes, in amounts and payable as follows: $86.67 on the first day of January, 1881; $86.67 on the first day of January, 1882, and $86 66 on the first day of January, 1883. That said harvester was delivered to the *530defendant, who received it, but refused to execute the notes according to his contract.
Th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thornton v. WynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Palmer v. PeopleNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Seymour v. StreetNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Converse v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Roberts v. SwearingenNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Warrick v. RoundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Davis v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Woods v. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Thomas v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Spurck v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.