Legal Opinion

Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1973No. 72-2355, 72-1005PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

The Administrator of EPA 1 resists an application by Ethyl Corporation filed under the Freedom of Information Act, 2 to require the production of seven documents containing medical and scientific data and considered by him in connection with the issuance of proposed lead regulations under the Clean Air Act. 3 He contended initially that the documents were exempt from production by the terms of Section (b)(5) of the Act. When the District Court, after hearing testimony and considering affidavits submitted, expressed the intention to require production of the-…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  5. Bristol-Myers Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. López Vives v. Policía de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  4. Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Hamilton, Superintendent v. VerdowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API