Legal Opinion

Hamilton, Superintendent v. Verdow

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 1980No. [Misc. No. 4, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code (1974, 1980 Repl. Vol.), § 12-601 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland has certified to this Court two questions of Maryland law. In general, they are (1) whether, in the circumstances of this case, Code (1957,1979 Repl. Vol.), Art. 59, § 19, prohibits the discovery from a State mental hospital of a former patient’s medical records, and (2) whether the doctrine of executive privilege prevents the discovery and the in camera inspection…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Office of the Governor v. Washington Post Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Doe v. Alaska Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API