Legal Opinion
Harris v. Neuman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided December 12, 1934No. 10334PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The allegations of the petition as 'amended state a good cause of action. What passed between Ed Harris and Neuman, according to the petition, constituted Neuman an agent to procure the money, with which to pay the debts which were in existence before the $1750 loan was procured from Mrs. Bessie Harris. Neuman received this $1750 in trust to apply to the old debts of Ed Harris. The allegations are sufficient to justify the conclusion that petitioner’s $1800, solicited from her by Neuman for the purpose of paying Ed’s debt, the $1750 loan from Mrs. Harris, was used for that purpose. The loan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Wallace v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Pierce v. Middle Georgia Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Ulman, Magill & Jordan Woolen Co. v. MagillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Stephens v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Knight v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Harris v. NeumanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Oklahoma City Federal Savings & L. Ass'n v. SwatekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.