Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hancock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1926No. 5367PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

The petition sets out a cause of action. This will fully appear from the statement of facts preceding this opinion. This being so, the court below did not err in overruling the demurrer upon the ground that the petition set forth no cause of action; and this would render any further consideration of the case by us unnecessary, but for the fact that this court would have no jurisdiction to determine any of the assignments of error if the petition does not make a case in equity.

Does the petition make a case in equity? It was framed upon the theory that the contract between the plaintiff and J.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Calbeck v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Walker Electrical Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. McDonald v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API