Legal Opinion
Harris v. Neuman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 15, 1936No. 11311PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. The petition in this case was considered in Harris v. Neuman, 179 Ga. 879 (177 S. E. 698), where it was held that “the petition as amended was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer upon which it was dismissed, and the motion to strike should not have been sustained.” A sufficient statement of the plaintiff’s allegations will be found in that report. After the ease was remanded, the plaintiff amended her petition by alleging that the defendant Neuman “is now seeking to contend” that the plaintiff’s husband was not a debtor, but “was a vendor of said tract to said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudgins Contracting Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- O'Callaghan v. Bank of EastmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Harris v. NeumanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Hill v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robitzsch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. SuttlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Whitner v. WhitnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Jacobs v. RittenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.