Legal Opinion
Ulman, Magill & Jordan Woolen Co. v. Magill
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 15, 1923No. 3435PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The transcript of the record in this ease was transmitted to this court with the following certificate:
“ The Court of Appeals desires instruction from the Supreme Court upon the following, question, a determination of which is necessary for the decision of this case: Will the statute law of. Missouri, providing that where a married woman signs a promissory note as surety for her husband she is liable for the amount of the note, be enforced in this State, in a case where a married woman living in Missouri signs in Missouri a promissory note as *556surety for her husband, the contract to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Benton & Brother v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Bond v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Sally v. Bank of UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Convergys Corp. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Mathews v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Pratt v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.