Legal Opinion

Keast v. Santa Ysabel Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1902No. Sac. No. 899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiffs, the heirs at law of Alfred H. Keast, sued defendant to recover damages for negligently causing his death. From the judgment which followed the verdict of the jury in their favor, and from the order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

Alfred H. Keast was a miner in the .employ of defendant, and at the time of his death was at work with a companion at the bottom of a shaft. By order of the foreman a timber was sent down the shaft, to be landed at the five-hundred-foot level. While the workmen at this point were engaged in hauling this timber from the shaft onto the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gallagher v. Market Street Railway Co. of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stephens v. ElliottMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Evans v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sneed v. Marysville Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Valente v. Sierra Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API