Sneed v. Marysville Gas & Elec. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, William B. Bosley, Forbes & Dinsmore, and F. P. Deering, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the death of the deceased, James L. Sneed, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff recovered judgment, defendant moved for a new trial, and its motion was denied. The defendant appealed from the judgment, and also from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The action was begun by James A. Sneed, the father of the deceased, as the administrator of the estate. After judgment, James A. Sneed died, and .the present plaintiff was substituted in his place, as administratrix and as plaintiff.
The deceased at the time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Mamou v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Griffey v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.