Legal Opinion

Valente v. Sierra Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1910No. Sac. No. 1676PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action was brought to recover damages from the defendant for the death of the wife of plaintiff, Frank Valente, and mother of the other plaintiffs (minors at the time of her death) alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of the defendant in the operation of one of its trains. The jury returned a'verdict in favor of plaintiffs for fourteen thousand dollars upon which judgment was entered. Defendant moved for a new trial and from the order denying it this appeal is taken.

No claim is made that the verdict is not justified by the evidence except to the extent that it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Boyce v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Anderson v. SeropianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API