Legal Opinion

Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1978No. 537 and 552PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

The instant case involves a fairly complicated factual situation as well as a procedural one. Two appeals have been consolidated for our review, however, both have their origins in a case initiated by the wife and administratrix of the estate of Lewis M. Webb who was killed while in the employ of the Sargent Electric Company. As briefly as possible without omission of any salient facts the history of the appeals are as follows:

The Duquesne Light Company in an effort to improve its operations entered into a contract with the Stone & Webster Engineering Company (hereinafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Paul v. Hess Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. McNett v. BriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Barson's & Overbrook, Inc. v. Arce Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fady v. Danielson Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Dion v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Kirby v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Centric Corp. v. Drake Building Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Turner Construction Co v. HebnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API