Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Majorana

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1983No. 74 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1982PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

We granted appellant leave to appeal Superior Court’s en banc order, 299 Pa.Super. 211, 445 A.2d 529, affirming Luzerne County Common Pleas’ judgments of sentence after a Luzerne County jury found appellant guilty of unlawful restraint and criminal conspiracy to commit rape. *604One codefendant, Gerald Nickol, was also convicted of unlawful restraint and criminal conspiracy, while a third codefendant, Richard Nickol, was convicted of these crimes as well as rape and indecent assault.1 Common Pleas sentenced appellant to a term of 6 to 23V2 months on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. StrubeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. MajoranaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SpiewakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API