Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Majorana

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1982No. 628PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Appellant and two co-defendants were charged with Rape,1 Indecent Assault,2 Unlawful Restraint3 and Criminal Conspiracy.4 At a jury trial appellant [hereinafter James] and one co-defendant [hereinafter Gerald] were convicted of Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Restraint. The third defendant [hereinafter Richard] was convicted of all four crimes.

*213This appeal by James is based on the assertion that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Richard to testify at the trial that he had engaged in consensual intercourse with the complainant earlier in the evening. The trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. StrubeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MajoranaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. QuartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. DearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Testerman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BooneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API