Legal Opinion
State v. Foote
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. AC 23712PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Stanley Foote, entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to the charge of possession of cocaine with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of *358General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). He appeals from the judgment of conviction on that charge pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, claiming that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress because it incorrectly (1) concluded that he was not seized illegally by the police and (2) determined that he consented to the search of the vehicle he was driving. We disagree and affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. KimbleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Foote v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Foote v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.