Foote v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The petitioner, Stanley Foote, following a grant of certification to appeal by the habeas court, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly dismissed his habeas petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the petitioner was not in the custody of the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, on the challenged conviction when he filed his petition, as required by General Statutes § 52-466. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
Our…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Langston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Vitale v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Vazquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.