Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Hunnicutt Construction

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1999No. CA 98-1519PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Vernon Woodall appeals the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of benefits to him, arguing on appeal that (1) there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision and (2) the fact that appellant’s co-worker was not injured is not evidence of appellant’s impairment. We agree with appellant’s arguments and reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

On June 5, 1997, while assisting in the construction of a roof, appellant fell when a scaffold collapsed. Appellant, a thirty-seven-year-old carpenter, sustained bilateral calcaneal fractures to both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Wade v. Mr. C. Cavenaugh'sSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DisheroonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodall v. Hunnicutt ConstructionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Maverick Transportation v. BuzzardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Byars Construction Co. v. ByarsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Flowers v. Norman Oaks Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API