Harley Willis v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Stephens County Court; W. H. Admire, Judge. Action by Harley & Willis, against P. Stanley. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Citing: 6 A. & E. Enc. Law (2d Ed.) 455, and cases cited; Savely v. Revinal, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 96; Tufts v. Griffin,, 107 N. C. 47; Burnley v. Tufts, 66 Miss. 48; Owensby v. Swan, 59 S. W. 378; Cole v. Hines, 81 Md. 476 ; First Cong. Church, v. Furniture Co., 15 Colo.
Read the full summary
Error from Stephens County Court; W. H. Admire, Judge. Action by Harley & Willis, against P. Stanley. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Citing: 6 A. & E. Enc. Law (2d Ed.) 455, and cases cited; Savely v. Revinal, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 96; Tufts v. Griffin,, 107 N. C. 47; Burnley v. Tufts, 66 Miss. 48; Owensby v. Swan, 59 S. W. 378; Cole v. Hines, 81 Md. 476 ; First Cong. Church, v. Furniture Co., 15 Colo. App. 46; Phillips v. Ilollenberg Music Co., 82 Ark. 9; Marion Mfg. Co. v. Buchanan, 118 Tenn. 238. Citing: Arthur v. Blackman (C. G.) 63 Fed. 536; Bishop v. Minderhout. 128…
1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.
December 7, 1907, Harley & Willis, plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, filed their action in the county court of Stephens county, Okla., against Mrs. P. Stanley, to recover the price agreed to be paid by. the defendant for certain furniture and other items sold and delivered by plaintiffs to the defendant. The answer was a general denial. The uncontradicted evidence shows that the bill of goods was sold by plaintiffs to defendant under an agreement that the title was to remain in plaintiffs until they were paid for. The defendant received the goods and placed them in her house, which, without…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glisson v. Heggie Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cole v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Bishop v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Marion Manufacturing Co. v. BuchananTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Randle v. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coffin v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Nevada Motor Co. v. BreamNevada Supreme Court · 1928
- Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. QuinetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- International Harvester Co. of America v. PottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Oklahoma Maytag Co. v. WorthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939