Legal Opinion

Marion Manufacturing Co. v. Buchanan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

FROM WILLIAMSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Williamson County. — John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

Complainant, a manufacturer, brought this suit against the defendants to recover the purchase price of a threshing machine. The defendants resist the right to recover upon the ground that the machine had been consumed by fire within a few days after it was purchased, and that the fire originated in consequence of the defective construction of the machine. Defendants also resist complainant’s claim upon the ground' that, when they purchased the threshing machine, complainant retained title thereto until the purchase money should *240be paid in full, and that when the machine was destroyed by fire…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bishop v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Randle v. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Tufts v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Burnley v. TuftsMississippi Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McDonald Automobile Co. v. BicknellTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. JaussaudWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. BowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API