Legal Opinion
Nevada Motor Co. v. Bream
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1928No. 2790PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The covenants, terms, conditions, obligations and consequents contained in the conditional sale contract executed by appellant and defendant Bream are authorized by and are within the permissive scope of the provisions of the Nevada uniform sales act, Stats. of 1915, p. 194, et seq., and particularly of certain sections thereof.
Not only did defendant Bream at no time have any title to the automobile, but, further, at no time did he have an attachable interest therein. Studebaker Co. v. Witcher (Nev.), 195 P. 338; Cardinal v. Edwards, 5 Nev. 36; Dillon and West v. Grutt (Nev.),144 P. 743;…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Consolidated Goldacres Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Truitt v. Patten, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- E. L. Jones & Co. v. UnruhSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Freuhauf Trailer Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Johnson v. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.