Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Continental Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1927No. Appeal, 135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In what was formerly called an action of deceit, plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant trust company, for the value of certain bonds, which he had been induced to purchase by false and fraudulent representations; the court in banc entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, and plaintiff now appeals. Under these circumstances “all the evidence and inferences therefrom, favorable to plaintiff, must be taken as true, and all unfavorable to him, if depending solely on testimony, must be rejected”: Dunbar v. Preston, 285 Pa. 502.

Under this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Dunbar v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Ziegler v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kohn v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Moyer v. Blue Mountain Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Lincoln v. ChristianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. O'Malley v. Penn Athletic ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API