Harris v. Fitchville Township Trustees
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Objections (Doc. No. 52) to the March 7, 2001, Report and Recommenda tion (Doc. No. 49) of the United States Magistrate Judge, in which the Magistrate recommended that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31). In accordance with Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208 (6th Cir.1981), and 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) & (C), this Court has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge’s findings to which the Plaintiffs object. For the following reasons, the Magistrate’s Report and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ellinos, Inc. v. Austintown TownshipDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- BAS Enterprize, Inc. v. City of MaumeeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- PCC Airfoils, LLC v. DaughertyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.