American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentAlice Robie Resnick, J.
{¶ 77} It has long been established that “[i]n determining whether an ordinance is in ‘conflict’ with general laws, the test is whether the ordinance permits or licenses that which the statute forbids and prohibits, and vice versa.” Struthers v. Sokol (1923), 108 Ohio St. 263, 140 N.E. 519, at paragraph two of the syllabus. See, also, State v. Burnett (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 419, 431, 755 N.E.2d 857; Middleburg Hts. v. Ohio Bd. of Bldg. Stds. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 510, 512, 605 N.E.2d 66. In other words, “[n]o real conflict can exist unless the ordinance declares something to be right which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. BurnettOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of OregonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Cincinnati v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.