Legal Opinion
Halen v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2002No. 27181PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REVIEW
KIDWELL, Justice.
Brian Halen (Halen) refused to submit to a police officer’s request for a blood withdrawal to test the concentration of alcohol in his blood. At a hearing held pursuant to I.C. § 18-8002, Halen argued that his driver’s license should not be suspended because his fear of needles was sufficient cause for refusing the blood withdrawal and because the law enforcement advisory form did not properly inform him of the consequences of a refusal. The magistrate court and the district court upheld the administrative suspension. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We affirm.
I
FACTS…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. DiazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DeWittIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Miller v. IDAHO STATE PATROLIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.