Legal Opinion

Miller v. IDAHO STATE PATROL

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2011No. 37032PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Idaho State Trooper Christopher Yount and the Idaho State Police appeal the district court’s decision not to grant summary judgment in their favor on Jason Miller’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state tort law alleging that Officer Yount unreasonably catheterized him following an arrest for DUI. 1 Because American search-and-seizure law is undeveloped as to when an officer may administer an involuntary warrantless catheterization on a suspect, Officer Yount was entitled to qualified immunity for the § 1983 claim. Further, Yount did not act with…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Idaho Falls, an Idaho Mun. Corp. v. H-K Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Melene James v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hoffer v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API