Legal Opinion

People v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no basis to disturb the suppression court’s determination that the showup identification of defendant by Sergeant Smith was not impermissibly suggestive. Because the showup was proximate in time and space to the scene of the crime, it was an appropriate means of securing a prompt identification (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1024). Additionally, the possibility of misidentification was greatly reduced because the confirmatory identification was made by a police officer who was trained to be both accurate and objective (see, People v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. FunderburkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API