Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Love
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
Love sued the appellants, and alleged that on the first of March, 1854, he was in the employment of the said company as engineer, and whilst so engaged in running an engine, &c., the same “ ran off the track, in spite of the reasonable care and diligence of the plaintiff, and which running off was in consequence of the imperfect and insufficient connection of the track where the said track crossed other tracks — the defendants being bound to keep said track in good running condition;” and that his leg was unavoidably crushed, &c.
Demurrer to the complaint, assigning two causes—
1. That it does…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Porter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.